An Interview With… Henrik Godsk

Few contemporary painters draw upon such a distinctive combination of cultural heritage, craftsmanship and art historical reference as Danish artist Henrik Godsk. A seventh-generation traveller whose earliest artistic education came through painting fairground facades, Godsk has developed a visual language that bridges geometric abstraction, portraiture and decorative tradition. His paintings, populated by enigmatic figures suspended between past and present, combine the formal rigour of Cubism and Modernism with influences drawn from medieval murals, Baroque portraiture and the visual culture of travelling fairs.

Working from Northern Jutland, surrounded by forests, lakes and open countryside, Godsk creates compositions that feel simultaneously timeless and deeply personal. His restrained palette, geometric structures and quietly expressive figures reflect an ongoing exploration of identity, memory, ancestry and the universal aspects of the human condition. Beneath their apparent simplicity lies a rich network of references that connects centuries of artistic practice with lived experience and cultural heritage.

In this interview, Henrik Godsk discusses the evolution of his distinctive visual language, the influence of his traveller roots, the role of geometry and constraint within his creative process, and how history, place and personal narrative continue to shape his work today.

Your geometric, androgynous figures feel both timeless and contemporary. How do you approach the human form as a structure: emotionally, symbolically and geometrically?

I have always been interested in the human form. My first canvases, which I did as a young teenager, were imaginary portraits. They were a little more representational at the beginning, but they gradually became very simplified and abstract. The face, and then the entire human body, became a vessel for my exploration of form and colour. Only the essential elements have been retained; everything else has been omitted. No ears, hands, nothing. They have always been very understated. Frozen in time. Emotions are kept under the surface, you might say. But I have found that they have a human presence. They often refer to some of my ancestors, but they generally represent something universal.

You are a seventh-generation traveller, and your earliest artistic training came from painting fairground facades. How has this formative, hands-on tradition shaped your relationship with colour, pattern and scale today?

My family tree can be traced back seven generations, but it really dates back several centuries. My great-great-great-grandfather, Heinrich Christoffer Hertzberg, arrived in Denmark in the mid-1850s. We know a little bit about his parents, but that is about as far as the family tree goes. Accordingly, I call myself a seventh-generation traveller.  

I grew up with geometric abstraction as part of my visual vocabulary. From the very beginning, I drew triangles and other geometrical shapes. I often say that this early training taught me to look at the world in geometric shapes. It has become part of my visual DNA. Given that we were decorating panels and facades, which are often seen from a distance and should work both day and night, we used bright colors and contrasts, mixed with a field of neutral greys and soft blues. All of this has affected my visual vocabulary to this day.

Art history is deeply embedded in your work, from Cubism and early Modernism to medieval church murals and Baroque portraiture. How do you decide which historical references enter a painting, and how consciously do you weave them together?

My visual language has developed over time. Earlier, I was more conscious about the specific references. Now, it sort of just happens. I never considered myself a playful postmodernist who would invoke art history to raise questions about authenticity; I am aware of the shoulders that I am standing on. The periods that I reference are the ones that I am drawn to.

The fusion of so-called “high” art and folkloric fairground aesthetics is central to your practice. Do you see your work as challenging traditional hierarchies within art history, or simply reflecting lived experience?

A short answer would be that it comes natural to me. 

Your portraits often depict androgynous figures that seem familiar yet unknowable. What draws you to ambiguity and anonymity in portraiture rather than individual likeness?

I think they were a lot more androgynous a few years back. And yet they still do not seem like particular people. It is important to me that the story is open-ended and universal. I'm trying to create a pictorial universe that I do not fully understand myself, where new narratives flourish. I am attracted to mystery and ambiguity.

Geometry plays a strong role in your compositions, echoing both Cubism and decorative traditions. Is geometry for you a formal tool, a narrative device, or a way of organising emotion?

Geometry works as a way for me to create order. I rely on very few geometrical elements combined with a few organic flourishes. It is very restrictive in its own way. I find freedom in constraint. I am not allowed to do much, but those limitations give me the freedom to really concentrate on the few decisions that I can make. I like to make order out of things. It calms me down. 

Having begun painting as a child and later studying art and literature academically, how do instinct and intellectual reflection coexist within your creative process today?

Through academia, I became more conscious of my choices and approach as a painter. My field of interest focused on modernism, postmodernism, and post-irony in literature, while I had an eye on art history and philosophy at the same time. I was very inspired by the generation of writers headed by David Foster Wallace, who attempted to come up with a literary solution to the endgame of postmodernism. What are we left with when all grand narratives have been broken down? Is communication possible without transcendent signifiers? There were many questions and many answers. Inspired by this, I sharpened my pen and focused on creating a visual language that had its own logic. I wanted to make order out of things. I wanted to create a pictorial universe that was calming. It was not a naive return to modernism, but rather an attempt to create a pictorial universe that points to its own constructedness while attempting to be honest and calming at the same time. 

The visual language of the travelling fair carries connotations of spectacle, movement and ephemerality. How do these ideas translate into the stillness and psychological depth of your painted figures?

I was always much more drawn to the aesthetics of antique carousels and rides than the more modern versions. The former was characterised by restraint, patterns and refinement, while the latter is much more overt and spectacular. In addition, before the facades are mounted, many rides and fair installations look like formalist sculptures. Most people never really experience a fair like that. I always preferred it before all the facades had been mounted and the lights were turned on. 

Living and working in Northern Jutland, away from major art centres, how does place and isolation influence your focus, rhythm and artistic voice?

From my studio, I can see a big green field with cows on it. Not so far from here, there is a big forest with a lake where we often go for walks. It is very calming. I think it reflects in my work. I go to different places in the world 8-10 times a year for shows. Mostly big cities. Other than that, I live and work away from the noise. It is very healthy for me as a person, and it gives me time to focus on my work. 

Interestingly, I am working on a show that focuses on the forest and the lake mentioned above. It is titled “The Lake” and will be shown at Vigo Gallery in May. A century ago, eight of the largest traveller families in Denmark lived side by side around this lakeside in their wagons. For the travellers, the lake served as a temporary sanctuary where they could stay between touring with their funfairs and circuses. The Hertzberg family, to which I belong, had their spot near the top of the lake. Every time I go there, I think of them. 

All images courtesy of Henrik Godsk

When your work enters public and private collections, removed from the fairground and studio alike, what do you hope viewers encounter: a sense of history, identity, or something more elusive?

All of the above. I am very proud of my family history and the culture it represents. Traveller culture is not really a part of the history books in Denmark. A few publications can be found, but it is almost a hidden story. I hope that I can help put more focus on the culture I come from. 

Having said that, my work is about much more than my cultural heritage, and I hope that my paintings can be appreciated as aesthetic explorations of the human condition.


I would like to thank Henrik Godsk for generously sharing his time and insights. His reflections on heritage, artistic process and the enduring relationship between history and contemporary painting offer a fascinating perspective on a practice shaped by both personal experience and centuries of cultural tradition. We look forward to following the continued evolution of his work and future exhibitions.


More Conversations

Next
Next

An Interview With… Xavier Lust